Appendix A — The Science Behind The Goulding System

Suggestion and the Subconscious – From Coué to Modern Psychology

The idea that positive suggestions can influence mental processes has deep historical roots. Over a century ago, French psychologist Émile Coué observed that “autosuggested ideas… exist in us without our knowledge; and we can only know that they exist there by the effects they produce.” [a1].

Coué’s method of conscious autosuggestion – epitomized by the phrase “Every day, in every way, I’m getting better and better” – illustrated how repeated verbal statements can influence underlying belief systems. In essence, Coué proposed that repeated ideas may be internalised over time, influencing behaviour and emotional responses.

Modern psychology has since provided empirical support for key aspects of this insight: thoughts and mental imagery can evoke measurable physiological and emotional responses [a2]. For example, imagining a calming scene can reduce heart rate and subjective anxiety, whereas imagining threat can activate physiological stress responses similar to those observed during real danger [a2].

This power of the imagination underlies many therapeutic techniques today. The Goulding System leverages this same principle of positive suggestion, but delivers it at a time and in a manner (during a child’s sleep) designed to bypass resistance.

As Coué observed, if the will (conscious mind) and imagination (subconscious) are in conflict, imagination often prevails [a1] – which is precisely why working directly with the subconscious through suggestion can be so transformative. Modern research in cognitive psychology confirms that repeated thoughts can become integrated into self-image and behaviour over time [a1].

In short, long-standing psychological principles support the view that gentle, consistent messages of love and confidence can gradually shape a child’s inner narrative. The following sections explore how advances in neuroscience and clinical psychology provide scientific context for the Goulding System.

The Brain at Night: Why Sleep-Time Suggestion Works

Does the sleeping brain really listen? Decades of research suggest that the answer is yes — at least to things that matter. Far from “turning off,” the brain remains active during sleep, continuing to process information and monitor the environment for significance. In sleep research, this has been measured through EEG, which records tiny electrical responses in the brain to meaningful sounds and events. One of these responses is called the P300 — a brief brainwave that appears about 300 milliseconds after the brain notices something important, such as a personally meaningful sound. It is often used by researchers as a marker of attention and recognition.

For instance, even in Stage 2 non-REM sleep (light sleep), researchers have found that a sleeping person’s brain responds differently to their own name than to other names. In one study, sleepers produced this same kind of meaningful-recognition response — the P300 — when hearing their own name, much as they do when awake. This suggests that even during light sleep, the brain can still register personal relevance rather than simply hearing sound as meaningless background noise.

Any parent who has tip-toed around a sleeping child has observed a similar kind of selectivity: a passing car may not stir them, but a soft cry from their baby may bring instant alertness. The brain does not respond equally to everything. It continues filtering for what matters.

The Goulding System capitalizes on this property by having parents deliver suggestions in a soothing voice that the child’s subconscious will recognize as important and safe. The child remains asleep (the conscious “Top Hat” of the mind stays off), but the subconscious is listening intently via this neural “antenna” [a16].

Crucially, the timing of the Goulding System routine is aligned with the science of sleep stages. Parents are instructed to speak to their child during light Stage II or early Stage III sleep – corresponding to the brain’s alpha and theta wave ranges (approximately 8–6 Hz). In this drowsy, semi-dreaming state, the conscious critical faculty is subdued, while the subconscious is highly receptive. Notably, these are the same brainwave frequencies observed in hypnosis and deep meditation [a2].

Neuroscientists have found that theta wave activity increases during hypnotic trance, correlating with heightened suggestibility and even analgesia (reduced pain perception) [a2]. In other words, inducing a theta-dominant state – whether through a formal hypnotic induction or naturally at sleep onset – opens the door for suggestions to be absorbed more readily.

Young children slip into these lower-frequency brain states quite often (they spend much of early childhood in theta, the imaginative daydreaming mode), which partly explains why they are so impressionable. By engaging a child during light sleep, The Goulding System targets a window of opportunity when the subconscious mind can accept positive statements without the “firewall” of waking scepticism.

Beyond mere receptivity, sleep itself plays a powerful role in consolidating learning and memory. Modern sleep research has overturned the old assumption that nothing new can stick in a sleeping brain. While it’s true that one cannot teach entirely new academic knowledge in deep sleep, the sleeping brain can process and strengthen already familiar information – including emotional associations [a4].

Studies show that if you reintroduce cues related to something learned while awake, the brain will rehearse and reinforce those memories during sleep [a4]. For example, researchers have found that playing sounds or words linked to an awake learning task during slow-wave sleep can improve recall of that material the next day [a4]. The brain essentially “replays” the daytime experience and integrates it into long-term storage. In one striking experiment, a team at Northwestern University trained people to associate certain musical tones with unpleasant Odors (spoiled fish) while they slept.

Remarkably, after waking, hearing the tone alone caused subjects to scrunch their noses as if expecting the bad smell [a5]. In a follow-up study, smokers who were exposed to the smell of cigarettes paired with rotten eggs during sleep subconsciously formed an aversion – they woke up smoking less than before [a5]. These findings underscore that implicit learning and conditioning can occur without any conscious awareness on the sleeper’s part.

When it comes to children, the evidence is especially encouraging. A 2021 study, conducted at UC Davis, demonstrated that sleeping toddlers’ brains can recognize and solidify new words learned prior to bedtime [a6]. Researchers taught two-year-olds names for novel objects and then, during an overnight MRI scan, played back recordings of those names.

Even in slumber, the children’s hippocampus – the memory centre – lit up in response to the familiar words, correlating with how well they had learned them while awake [a6]. In short, the children’s brains were actively consolidating vocabulary in their sleep.

This aligns perfectly with the Goulding System approach: at night the child’s brain is already sorting and storing the day’s experiences, so a parent’s positive words about the child are likely to become part of that stored experience. Because the child already knows these simple words and their comforting meaning when spoken by a parent, hearing them during sleep reinforces the emotional memory.

The sleeping brain, unconstrained by waking distractions, essentially soaks in the message: “I am happy, I am loved, all is well.” Over many nights, this gentle conditioning accumulates into a powerful core belief.

Children’s High Receptivity to Suggestion

It is well established in clinical psychology that children are often more hypnotizable and suggestion-responsive than adults. In fact, a comprehensive 2024 review of 49 meta-analyses on hypnotherapy found the largest therapeutic effects of hypnosis were in paediatric populations [a7].

Young people’s vivid imaginations and open minds make them ideal candidates for suggestion-based interventions. Studies show that children and adolescents not only enter trance states more readily, but also derive significant benefits across various issues – from pain management to anxiety reduction – when hypnosis is applied [a7].

One analysis noted that, on average, treatment effects were stronger in children than adults for the same hypnotic procedures [a7]. The Goulding System is not hypnosis, but it shares key elements: relaxation, focused attention (albeit during sleep), and positive suggestion. Importantly, it also shares hypnosis’s excellent safety profile. Hypnotherapy has been endorsed by medical associations and shown in controlled trials to be a low-risk, effective tool for mental and somatic health issues [a7].

There are documented cases of children overcoming habits like nail-biting or bedwetting and coping better with fears after therapeutic suggestion techniques, all with no adverse effects beyond those of normal parenting interactions. In the Goulding System, the parent is essentially acting as the “hypnotherapist” each night, guiding the child into a tranquil state and offering direct and indirect suggestions.

Given the data, we can expect children to embrace and internalize these suggestions readily – often even more than an adult might in a comparable scenario – because a parent’s loving voice during a state of subconscious openness is an incredibly potent combination.

Young brains are wired to trust and absorb guidance from caregivers; when that guidance comes in a calm, uncritical moment, it can truly sink in. As the American Psychological Association’s definition of hypnosis notes, it is characterized by “an enhanced capacity for response to suggestion” [a7] – a description that could just as easily apply to a child nestled in Stage II sleep, hearing comforting words.

Developmental Windows of Receptivity – Why Early Childhood Matters

Modern brain research confirms something parents have always sensed: the early years matter deeply. A child’s brain is not fixed at birth. It is developing at remarkable speed. New connections (neural pathways) are forming. Others are being strengthened. Some are being trimmed away (a process known as synaptic pruning). During early childhood, this activity is especially intense. Scientists describe this as a period of heightened adaptability (neuroplasticity) — meaning the brain is particularly responsive to experience (Knudsen, 2004; Kolb & Gibb, 2011).

Researchers also describe “sensitive periods” — windows of time when experience has a particularly strong influence on how brain systems are organized. During these periods, repeated emotional experiences are more likely to become lasting internal patterns. In simple terms: what is repeated, strengthens. This principle helps explain why consistency is central to the Goulding System.

Cognitive Development and the Emerging Critical Mind

Developmental psychologist Jean Piaget described early childhood (approximately ages 2–7) as the preoperational stage. During this period, children think symbolically and imaginatively. However, structured logical reasoning is still developing (Piaget, 1952).

Young children do not consistently evaluate statements for accuracy. They tend to accept information — particularly from trusted adults — as true. Their internal “critical filter” (sometimes referred to in psychological literature as the critical faculty) is still forming.

Around ages 6–7, children gradually transition into what Piaget called the concrete operational stage. Logical reasoning becomes more structured. Brain regions associated with decision-making, impulse control, and analysis — particularly the prefrontal cortex — continue maturing throughout childhood and adolescence (Blakemore & Choudhury, 2006).

Before this maturation is fully established, children are naturally more receptive to relational messages. This does not mean children lack intelligence. It means their evaluative systems are still developing. Repeated emotional messages during these early years can therefore play a powerful role in shaping self-belief.

Brain Activity and Absorption States

Studies measuring electrical brain activity (electroencephalography, or EEG) show that young children display a higher proportion of slower brainwave activity compared to adults (Marshall, Bar-Haim, & Fox, 2002).

These slower patterns are associated with imaginative engagement and reduced analytical filtering. Interestingly, similar brainwave ranges appear in adults during relaxed, drowsy states — including the transition into sleep.

This overlap helps explain why both early childhood and light sleep are periods of increased receptivity.

It would be inaccurate to claim children “live in theta,” as is sometimes stated in popular psychology. However, it is accurate to say that young children spend more time in brain states associated with imaginative absorption and reduced cognitive filtering. This is developmental physiology — not mysticism.

Attachment and the Formation of Inner Templates

Attachment research provides some of the strongest support for the Goulding System’s approach. Psychiatrist John Bowlby proposed that children form “internal working models” — mental templates about themselves and others — based on repeated relational experiences (Bowlby, 1969).

If a child consistently experiences warmth and responsiveness, they tend to internalize a sense of safety and worth. If experiences are inconsistent or negative, the child may internalize insecurity or self-doubt. Long-term studies following children from infancy into adulthood (longitudinal research) show that securely attached children are more likely to develop healthy self-esteem and emotional regulation later in life (Sroufe, 2005).

Repeated relational messages shape these internal templates. The Goulding System operates directly within this attachment framework. It reinforces relational safety during a biologically receptive period.

How Beliefs Take Root

Research on how children learn from trusted adults shows that young children rely heavily on caregiver testimony when forming their understanding of the world (Harris, 2012). Children are not just absorbing information. They are absorbing meaning. Emotionally significant experiences are more likely to be consolidated (stabilized into memory). Brain research shows that emotional salience strengthens encoding processes (Schore, 2001).

This does not mean memory is permanent or infallible. Modern neuroscience makes clear that memory is reconstructive and can be updated over time (memory reconsolidation; Nader & Hardt, 2009). However, repeated emotionally meaningful experiences leave measurable neural traces that influence future interpretation. Repetition plus emotional safety strengthens pathways.

Neuroplasticity: A Brain That Can Change

For many years, scientists believed that the brain became largely fixed after childhood. Research over recent decades has shown this is not the case. The brain retains the capacity to reorganize itself by strengthening some neural connections and weakening others — a process known as neuroplasticity.

Norman Doidge’s synthesis of emerging neuroplasticity research helped popularize this understanding (Doidge, 2007). Although his book is not itself a peer-reviewed journal article, it draws from extensive laboratory research demonstrating cortical remapping and synaptic strengthening through repeated experience.

This insight was significant in Joane Goulding’s understanding of what may be occurring during the routine. If repeated experiences strengthen neural pathways, then consistent affirmations delivered during emotionally receptive states can plausibly reinforce adaptive circuits associated with calm, belonging, and self-worth.

Psychologist Donald Hebb summarized this process succinctly: “neurons that fire together wire together” (Hebb, 1949). When emotional reassurance is repeatedly activated, the neural networks associated with safety become more efficient.

Research examining how early caregiving affects stress regulation has shown that nurturing experiences can influence how certain stress-related genes are activated (Meaney & Szyf, 2005). This field — epigenetics (the study of how experience can influence gene activity without changing DNA itself) — demonstrates that repeated relational environments can shape stress biology over time.

This does not imply that every word permanently alters genetic code. It means repeated relational patterns can influence how the nervous system responds to stress.

Historical Influence: Coué and Suggestion

Émile Coué’s early work on conscious autosuggestion (1922) recognized that repeated verbal statements can influence subconscious belief structures. While his framework predates modern neuroscience, the principle that repetition influences belief aligns with contemporary findings in learning and neural adaptation.

Coué’s influence on Joane Goulding was philosophical rather than technical. The Goulding System does not rely on blind repetition, but on emotionally congruent, relationally grounded repetition delivered during a state of reduced resistance.

Bringing It Together

Across developmental neuroscience, attachment research, cognitive maturation theory, and neuroplasticity, several consistent findings emerge:

Early childhood represents a period of heightened adaptability (neuroplasticity).

Repeated relational messages shape internal working models.

Emotional safety strengthens memory consolidation.

Analytical filtering develops gradually.

Repetition strengthens neural pathways.

The Goulding System operates within these established principles. It is grounded in timing, repetition, emotional safety, and the known adaptability of the developing brain.

Positive Parenting, Attachment, and Belief Formation

At its heart, the Goulding System is a parenting intervention grounded in emotional communication. Its scientific plausibility is bolstered by decades of research on attachment theory and child development, which tell us one simple truth: children become what they are told they are. Consistent parental messages and behaviours literally wire a child’s sense of self.

Developmental psychologists have documented that the early years (roughly ages 0–7) are a uniquely sensitive period when children’s brains are “sponges” for beliefs about themselves and their world [a8].

At this young age, kids do not critically analyse praise or criticism – they simply absorb it as truth. Thus, a child repeatedly told “You are loved, you are good” is likely to construct a self-image of being lovable and good, whereas a child who hears (or senses) “You’re a problem, no one cares” will come to believe they are unworthy.

This aligns with John Bowlby’s attachment theory and the mountains of evidence since: secure attachment in childhood yields high self-esteem, while insecure or negative attachment experiences sow seeds of self-doubt.

Studies indicate that children with secure attachments (i.e. whose caregivers are consistently responsive and nurturing) are far more likely to develop a strong sense of self-worth [a9]. In one long-term study, infants classified as securely attached later viewed themselves as “deserving of love and attention,” a confidence traceable directly to the steady support they received early on [a9].

Conversely, children who endure inconsistent, neglectful, or harsh caregiving often internalize feelings of unworthiness, essentially believing “I do not deserve love” [a9]. These negative core beliefs can persist into adulthood, undermining relationships and mental health decades later [a9].

The Goulding System is, in effect, a nightly patch against insecure attachment and low self-esteem. By flooding the child’s subconscious with verbal warmth and affirmation, parents counteract any toxic messages the child may have received (whether from earlier trauma, daily stress, or simply their own self-criticism). It’s a direct way to ensure the last thing the child’s brain “hears” each day is unconditional love. Biological research lends strong support to the healing power of this approach.

When a child feels loved and happy — the emotional state the Goulding System aims to induce — they feel secure, and their brain chemistry shifts out of threat mode. One of the key neurochemicals involved in bonding and stress regulation is oxytocin, sometimes referred to as the “attachment hormone.” Oxytocin is released during warm, affiliative interactions between parent and child and plays an important role in modulating stress responses and social bonding [a10].

Research shows that oxytocin can reduce activation in the amygdala (the brain’s threat-detection centre) and influence the regulation of stress hormones such as cortisol [a10]. In practical terms, this neurochemical shift supports feelings of calm, safety, and connection. Positive, affectionate interactions — such as soothing conversation, physical closeness, or a reassuring bedtime routine — are associated with increases in oxytocin activity and corresponding reductions in stress reactivity [a10].

Each Goulding System session mirrors these biological conditions. The child, asleep but hearing a familiar loving voice, experiences cues of relational safety at a time when the brain is already consolidating emotional memory. Over repeated nights, this consistent pairing of parental warmth with states of relaxation may help reinforce neural pathways associated with trust and emotional regulation. This is how the Goulding System “replaces fear with love” in a literal neurobiological sense — not through magic, but through repeated activation of bonding and stress-regulation pathways in the brain

Moreover, when parents engage in the Goulding System routine, they often find it improves daytime interactions as well. By focusing on positive attributes each night, parents reinforce their own attunement to the child’s strengths, leading to a virtuous cycle of encouragement. Research on child development emphasizes that genuine praise and affirmations, when tied to real efforts or qualities, significantly boost children’s resilience and confidence [a8]. The key is authenticity and specificity (e.g. “You try so hard, I’m proud of you” versus empty flattery).

The affirmations in the Goulding System’s Foundation Statement were refined over 50 years to hit that sweet spot of believable, context-rich positivity. They are worded to feel real to the child, even at a subconscious level. This aligns with best practices for affirmations: studies show that children respond best to positive statements that reflect achievable truths or growth, rather than unrealistic absolutes [a8].

By telling a child nightly that they are loved, good, and improving, we are effectively installing a secure attachment narrative in their mind. It’s like repeatedly watering a plant – those words nurture the child’s self-concept, which then blossoms in the form of calmer behaviour, self-esteem, and emotional stability.

Rewiring the Brain – Neuroplasticity and Lasting Change

The emotional bonds we form and the words we hear in early life do more than shape our feelings — they literally sculpt the architecture of the brain itself. Modern neuroscience now confirms what intuition long suggested—our brains are not fixed machines but living systems that reshape with every experience.

This capacity for change, known as neuroplasticity, refers to the brain’s lifelong ability to reorganize its structure and function by forming new neural connections. Every thought, emotion, and repeated experience leaves a physical trace, strengthening some circuits while pruning others.

Norman Doidge, in The Brain That Changes Itself, describes this extraordinary adaptability:

“The brain is a far more open system than we ever imagined… It has given us a brain that survives in a changing world by changing itself.” [a13] He explains that neural pathways function much like trails through a forest — the more often they are used, the clearer and faster they become. Each repetition of a behaviour, thought, or emotion literally “rewires” the system. Or as Doidge puts it, “the plastic brain is perpetually altered by every encounter, every interaction.” [a13]

For children, this malleability is at its peak. The neural networks governing self-image, confidence, and emotional regulation are forming rapidly, making them particularly sensitive to input. Adverse experiences can etch patterns of fear and insecurity, but nurturing experiences can just as powerfully strengthen pathways of safety, calm, and love.

The Goulding System taps into this principle directly. Each evening’s affirmations act as small but consistent exercises for the brain — practicing feelings of being loved, accepted, and secure. Over time, repetition consolidates these states into enduring neural templates.

As Doidge notes, “plastic change… can occur at almost any point in life, provided the stimulus is repeated and emotionally charged.” [a13]

This understanding echoes the classic principle first identified by psychologist Donald Hebb: “neurons that fire together, wire together.” [a14] Hebb’s rule describes how simultaneous activation of connected neurons strengthens their synaptic link. In simple terms, every time a parent repeats a message of reassurance — “You are loved, you are lovable” — those words fire networks of calm and belonging in the child’s brain. Each night’s repetition reinforces the same pattern, gradually making it the brain’s preferred pathway.

Biological research supports this process at the chemical level. When children experience affectionate, soothing interactions, the hormone oxytocin — sometimes called the “cuddle hormone” — is released, promoting bonding and relaxation. As Uvnäs-Moberg observed:

“The nonapeptide oxytocin… can induce anti-stress-like effects such as reduction of blood pressure and cortisol levels. In addition, it promotes growth and healing. Repeated exposure to oxytocin causes long-lasting effects by influencing the activity of other transmitter systems.” [a10]

The Goulding System’s calm, loving delivery mirrors these natural oxytocin-triggering conditions. A parent’s gentle voice at bedtime acts as a signal of safety, turning off the brain’s alarm systems and reinforcing the neurochemical pattern of trust.

Even children who have experienced early stress or trauma can recover ground through these mechanisms. Research by Meaney and Szyf demonstrated that maternal care can literally reprogram gene expression linked to stress regulation. Their landmark study concluded: “Early experience permanently alters behaviour and physiology. These effects are, in part, mediated by sustained alterations in gene expression in selected brain regions.” [a15]

In other words, nurturing experiences do not simply comfort the child — they change how the child’s biology responds to stress, down to the level of DNA methylation and gene activation.

Doidge highlights this same truth from a psychological perspective: “Ironically, some of our most stubborn habits and disorders are products of our plasticity.” [a13] The very feature that allows harmful patterns to form also allows healing to take place — given the right repetition, emotion, and timing. The Goulding System operates within this window, providing consistent, emotionally charged experiences of love that redirect the brain’s adaptive capacity toward well-being.

In practical terms, the process functions like a nightly “update patch.” Each repetition strengthens the circuits of calm and security, gradually overwriting those of fear or self-doubt. Over weeks and months, these become the brain’s default settings — the well-travelled neural roads that define how a child feels about themselves and relates to the world.

The Goulding System thus stands not as mystical or wishful thinking but as a natural application of established neuroscience. It harnesses the very mechanisms that underlie all learning and recovery: repetition, emotional engagement, and neuroplastic change. By understanding how the brain learns through love, parents can guide their children’s inner world toward resilience, confidence, and peace.

Summary: The Science Is Clear — But Action Makes It Real

Across every field we’ve explored — suggestion psychology, sleep research, child development, attachment theory, and neuroplasticity — the science supports what parents have long told us: the Goulding System works.

It aligns precisely with what modern neuroscience tells us about how the brain learns, heals, and grows.

Positive repetition, loving tone, emotional safety, and consistency activate the same biological and psychological pathways that build confidence, reduce stress, and foster resilience.

But like any proven process, its success depends on practice.

The brain only rewires through repetition — and that repetition depends on you.

If the book stays closed, if you never step quietly into your child’s room, if you rush the words or skip the routine, the System cannot work. The Goulding System is simple, but not passive: it’s a nightly act of love that simply requires showing up.

Think of it as brushing your child’s emotional teeth — a two-minute ritual that strengthens their mental and emotional health for life.

When done faithfully, the results compound quietly but powerfully.

Missed nights or skipped steps break the rhythm of reassurance that tells a child’s subconscious,

“You are loved, you are loveable you are happy.”

The evidence is clear; the mechanism is sound.

What transforms theory into change is the doing.

Action always beats inaction. The science shows how it works — the results show when you do.


References — Appendix A

External Links Notice

External hyperlinks are provided for reader convenience and reference only, and their inclusion does not constitute endorsement of the linked organisations, authors, or websites. Online content may change over time; links were verified as accurate at the time of publication, but the publisher and authors cannot guarantee the ongoing availability or content of external sites.

[a1] Coué, É. (1922).
Self-mastery through conscious autosuggestion. Dodd, Mead & Company.
[ARC] https://archive.org/details/selfmasterythrou0000coue

 

[a2] Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2013).
Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(3), 123–132.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3538

 

[a3] Perrin, F., García-Larrea, L., Mauguière, F., & Bastuji, H. (1999).
A differential brain response to the subject’s own name persists during sleep. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(12), 2153–2164.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00177-7

 

[a4] Rasch, B., & Born, J. (2013).
About sleep’s role in memory. Physiological Reviews, 93(2), 681–766.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00032.2012

 

[a5] Arzi, A., Shedlesky, L., Ben-Shaul, M., Nasser, K., Oksenberg, A., Hairston, I. S., & Sobel, N. (2012).
Humans can learn new information during sleep. Nature Neuroscience, 15(10), 1460–1465.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3193

 

[a6] Johnson, E. G., Mooney, L., Graf Estes, K., Nordahl, C. W., & Ghetti, S. (2021).
Activation for newly learned words in left medial-temporal lobe during toddlers’ sleep is associated with memory for words. Current biology: CB, 31(24), 5429–5438.e5.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.058

 

[a7] Rosendahl, J., et al. (2024).
Meta-analytic evidence on the efficacy of hypnosis for mental and somatic health issues: A 20-year perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1330238.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1330238

 

[a8] Knudsen, E. I. (2004).
Sensitive periods in the development of the brain and behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(8), 1412–1425.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042304796

 

[a9] Sroufe, L. A. (2005).
Attachment and development: A prospective, longitudinal study from birth to adulthood. Attachment & Human Development, 7(4), 349–367.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1080/14616730500365928

 

[a10] Olff, M., Frijling, J. L., Kubzansky, L. D., Bradley, B., Ellenbogen, M. A., Cardoso, C., … van Zuiden, M. (2013).
The role of oxytocin in social bonding, stress regulation and mental health: An update on the moderating effects of context and interindividual differences. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38(9), 1883–1894.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.06.019

 

[a11] Kolb, B., & Gibb, R. (2011).
Brain plasticity and behaviour in the developing brain. Journal of the Canadian Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry = Journal de l’Academie canadienne de psychiatrie de l’enfant et de l’adolescent, 20(4), 265–276.
[PMC] https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3222570/

 

[a12] Marshall, P. J., Bar-Haim, Y., & Fox, N. A. (2002).
Development of the EEG from 5 months to 4 years of age. Clinical Neurophysiology, 113(8), 1199–1208.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00163-3

 

[a13] Doidge, N. (2007).
The brain that changes itself: Stories of personal triumph from the frontiers of brain science. Viking Press.
[PUB]https://normandoidge.com/?page_id=1259

 

[a14] Hebb, D. O. (1949).
The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. Wiley.
[GBL] https://books.google.com.sg/books/about/The_Organization_of_Behavior.html?id=YpEHAQAAIAAJ&

 

[a15] Meaney, M. J., & Szyf, M. (2005).
Environmental programming of stress responses through DNA methylation: life at the interface between a dynamic environment and a fixed genome. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 7(2), 103–123.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2005.7.2/mmeaney

 

[a16] Harris, P. L. (2012).
Trusting what you’re told: How children learn from others. Harvard University Press.
[GBL] https://books.google.com/books/about/Trusting_What_You_re_Told.html?id=FZ-pzy7RD9YC&

 

[a17] Schore, A. N. (2001).
The effects of early relational trauma on right brain development. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22(1–2), 201–269.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0355(200101/04)22:1<201::AID-IMHJ8>3.0.CO;2-9

 

[a18] Nader, K., & Hardt, O. (2009).
A single standard for memory: The case for reconsolidation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 224–234.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2590

 

[a19] Blakemore, S.-J., & Choudhury, S. (2006).
Development of the adolescent brain: Implications for executive function and social cognition. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(3–4), 296–312.
[DOI] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01611.x
 

Read More: